The first Community of Practice that I found that I would like to be a part of is found at futureofchildren.org. It is made up of individuals from Princeton University and The Brookings Institution and these individuals work together "to translate the best social science research about children and youth into information that is useful to policymakers, practitioners, grant-makers, advocates, the media, and students of public policy." (futureofchildren.org). They write really great journals and articles on a huge range of early childhood topics and produce policy briefs each year. The reason why I really like this organization is because they have good sound research practices and they get to have a direct impact on politicians who make early childhood policies. One of the jobs I was really interested in is the job of outreach director. This individual gets to work with different groups of people and share the research and work that the group has completed. For this job, you would need excellent communication and organization skills to be able to keep track of all the different research and how it affects different groups you will work with. You would also need great time management skills to be able to prioritize the work you do.
The second organization is my favorite national organization that I have found and it deals directly with my capstone project: Children and Nature Network. This organization can be found at childrenandnature.org and I love this organization!! Their main goal is to bring nature experiences to children and families and try to re-establish a love of the outdoors for today's children. They base their ideas off of research they have found and share this information with a wide variety of audiences. They have different newsletters you can sign up for and the site is loaded with different research on the topic of nature and children. There are guides on how to use nature in your classroom and also how to have nature experiences as a family. The job I would love to have is National Coordinator, Nature Clubs for Families. The individual who currently has this job works with community members in different cities to establish nature clubs for families and helps them get ideas on how to do this and how to get them up and running. You would need to be a very enthusiastic about nature to have this position, be a people-person and be able to lead and coordinate different groups of people. You would also need to be a good communicator over different types of media because you may be communicating with individuals from all over and it may not be face-to-face.
The last organization I found is Early Learning Leaders. I chose this because I feel like it would be great to be part of their CoP. This groups primary purpose is to increase the knowledge of child care owners and directors by providing workshops and a national conference on differnet Early Childhood topics. You can become a member of this organization and have access to even more information, such as different trainings and help with getting your center accredited. The group can be found www.naccp.org. I would choose to keep the job that I have now and become a board member to work with this group of individuals. The board members come from all over the US and have different levels of experience. They meet to discuss Early Childhood issues, look over research that has been found on these issues and plans the trainings and conferences that they offer. For this job, communication and research skills would be necessary. I think you would also have to be a good public speaker, as they do some speaking engagements throughout the year.
The first organization I found is great for any of you seeking information on Early Childhood issues and I hope everyone takes a chance to look over what I have found.
References
futureofchildren.org
childrenandnature.org
www.naccp.org
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Saturday, July 13, 2013
I
was able to find two local agencies and one state agency that caught my
attention. The first agency I found
information on is the Early Childhood Coalition which can be found at www.eccqc.org.
The reason this caught my interest is because of a child I had in my
classroom years ago that I always wanted to have observed because I thought he
was somewhere on the Autism spectrum and his family refused on chances to get
him observed. I feel like this
organization could have been a great asset to this family and helped them in their
struggles with their child. The
organization provides support services to children with varying special needs
and they focus on Creative Curriculum and the Illinois Early Learning Standards
(Early Childhood Coalition). I had never
heard of this organization until I looked it up and I was shocked to see that
it serves 660 children located in 33 centers and home-based classrooms. The things I found really interesting about
this organization is that they have community circles, which reminded me of our
communities of practice we discussed this week, where families and other
interested individuals can meet to talk about different issues or topics. They have a meal and then discuss whatever
their topic is about. I felt like this
was similar to our community of practices because these individuals are
passionate about something and want to share their knowledge with others and
also learn from others in the community circle. They also offer free
developmental screenings for all children residing in Rock Island County, which
is the county I live in and where my center I work in is located. I did not know this service existed until I
looked at the website and this is great to know because this is a great service
that we can provide to our families if they would like to have their child
screened. There were no jobs listed
currently available with this organization, but if there were, the jobs would
require great communication, collaboration and organizational skills. A person would have to communicate with their colleagues
and also the families they are working with.
Depending on the child’s needs, an individual working for the
organization would have to work with other workers or the child’s teachers to
give the child the best services they required for their specific need.
The
second local organization I looked up is Bethany for Children and Families
which can be found at www.bethany-qc.org/index.htm. I drive by one of their buildings everyday on
my way home from work and have done races in the past that was a fundraiser for
this organization, but I was never quite sure what they did. Before I started this grad program, I considered
going to grad school for social work and this organization would fit great should
I ever decide to go that route. Their
motto is “to keep children safe, strengthen families and build healthy communities”
(Bethany for Children and Families).
They are a licensed child welfare agency and they have been in the
community since 1899!! They have expanded
their services and now they offer foster care and child welfare services and
currently specialize in at-risk youth.
Early intervention is something they are really striving to deliver to
the community. I felt this organization
could be very beneficial as a resource for parents in my current position
should anyone ever need to seek certain services. Their board of directors functions like a
community of practice because it contains various figures from the area, some
business owners, some philanthropic investors, and some educational figures and
they meet as one large group at times and they also break out into 5 different
community groups. The members have a
strong desire to provide services to the community and are passionate about the
work they do. As far as jobs go, the
only ones currently open are for a dental hygienist and a dentist, which I
would never qualify for or want to do.
If I could obtain a job through them, I would go the social work route and
try for something in either adoption or foster care services because I would
love to be able to help children either find their forever homes or at least
one home where they are safe and loved.
The
third organization I found is called Children’s Home + Aid and it is out of
Chicago, IL and can be found at childrenshomeandaid.org. I first learned of this organization last
year because through my work you can choose different organizations to donate
money to and this is one that I chose. They
protect, educate and counsel over 40,000 children, help them overcome poverty,
abuse and neglect and also provide adoption and foster care services. Their governing board is made up of various
community figures and business individuals.
What I found the most interesting about this organization is that they have
what is called the woman’s board and for the last 92 years, this group of woman have “dedicated their time
to help abused and neglected children” (Children’s Home + Aid). Their big fundraising effort right now is for
Early Childhood Care and Education on Chicago’s South Side. They also focus on school readiness, crisis
intervention, and parent support services.
The reason I liked this so much is because it seems rare to have a group
of only women leading an organization and meeting on a regular basis to get
things done for the early childhood community.
There are many jobs available through the organization right now, but
the one that really caught my eye was for a program coordinator for an
after-school program. The person researches
grants, provides family involvement programs and also sets up the schools
health model. I used to work at a before
and after school program and I always felt it was very important to have quality
after-school for kids that was safe, educational and also provided them with
physical activities to participate in. I
also like that health is included in this position because this was one of the
words on my wordle that interests me and I could have a positive impact on many
young children in this role. In order to
do well at this position, I would need good communication and organizational
skills and also be able to oversee other staff members.
After
doing some research on a variety of organizations, I realized how many there
are all over and it is just a matter of looking to find one that can assist
teachers or families in early childhood education.
References
Bethany for Children and
Families-www.bethany-qc.org/index.htm
Children’s Home + Aid-childrenshomeandaid.org
Early Childhood Coalition-www.eccqc.org
Tuesday, December 18, 2012
As we move on...
It is so crazy to me to think we are already done with another course. We're all moving on to our specializations and I can't help but think of how fast the time has gone by! We should all be done by the summer if that is the case....we got this!!! It has been so nice to be able to see a correlation between my personal and professional life and the courses that I take and this course was no different. Just a couple weeks, my relationship of 6.5 years ended and I was left with a large feeling of where do I go from here??? Now, I'm not looking for sympathy or pity, but the irony of the situation is when I stop to reflect on where it could have all went wrong, what we truly lacked was communication. We stopped really talking to each other and drifted apart, which created a lot of resentment in our relationship. I don't think without this course I would have realized that and I also don't know if I could have kept going if it wouldn't have been for all of you. The assignments kept my mind focused on something positive and it was nice to have the distraction. I know we have never met face-to-face, but we have all shared in this journey together and I looked forward to working with each of you every week. You have shared stories and experiences of your lives and I have learned a lot from all of you. I wish that I could continue to work with each of you during my upcoming specialization courses in Administration, Management and Leadership, but even if I don't, it would be great to see and meet all of you at graduation. Thank you for all the words of wisdom and good luck with future courses!!! Enjoy the next two weeks off.....I think we've earned it!!!
Saturday, December 8, 2012
Group Communication
This post is really hard for me because I don't have a lot of experience working with teams at my work or at least not in the way I think this assignment is referring to. I think high-performing groups are hard to leave because you are obviously quite good at getting the job done. I think it really depends on the group though, because even low-performing groups could be hard to leave. You have established relationships and may have even gotten to know people on a very personal level, so leaving them could be just as hard, even though you may not be as successful. Relationships are what makes any groups and it's the relationships that are hard to leave behind.
Again, I have not really worked or had a group that I had to leave, so I really do not know the answer to the question about which group has been the hardest for me to leave. Just over a year and a half ago, I joined a new team of the managers I work with and I would hate to have to leave this group. We may not always get everything accomplished or get it done perfectly, but they are a fine group of ladies and I consider all of them friends. We have yet to establish any closing rituals because none of us are going anywhere soon. I think we are still in the new stages of team forming and that is more where we are working on right now.
When I think about this program ending, I think, Wow....I will have a lot of free time and a lot more money!!! :) But then I get sad because even though I have never met any of you face-to-face we have gone through this great thing together, struggled together, succeeded together and it is always sad and hard to leave that behind. I think it is important to adjourn from a group because as you learn and grow, you could be best suited for other places and or you could be needed in other places. Sometimes when you work with people for too long, no new ideas come in and there can almost be a lack in performance. While it is hard to change, getting some fresh people and fresh ideas together could potentially make things better or at least different.
Again, I have not really worked or had a group that I had to leave, so I really do not know the answer to the question about which group has been the hardest for me to leave. Just over a year and a half ago, I joined a new team of the managers I work with and I would hate to have to leave this group. We may not always get everything accomplished or get it done perfectly, but they are a fine group of ladies and I consider all of them friends. We have yet to establish any closing rituals because none of us are going anywhere soon. I think we are still in the new stages of team forming and that is more where we are working on right now.
When I think about this program ending, I think, Wow....I will have a lot of free time and a lot more money!!! :) But then I get sad because even though I have never met any of you face-to-face we have gone through this great thing together, struggled together, succeeded together and it is always sad and hard to leave that behind. I think it is important to adjourn from a group because as you learn and grow, you could be best suited for other places and or you could be needed in other places. Sometimes when you work with people for too long, no new ideas come in and there can almost be a lack in performance. While it is hard to change, getting some fresh people and fresh ideas together could potentially make things better or at least different.
Friday, November 30, 2012
Helpful Communication stratagies
I just read the blog assignment for this week and since I will not be returning to work until Monday, I will not be able to get any feedback from my collagues that will be helpful to this blog. I do however have conflicts at work that I could use some of the information and strategies we learned about this week to help make them better. We have a new flex staff member at work that has never worked with children as young as what we have at our center, so a teacher in my building was chosen to be her mentor and to help assist in becoming more comfortable in working with infants. Since she is in classrooms in my building, I also have to work with her/help her learn the routines, rules and regulations our center follows. This started last week and it has been a very interesting two weeks. As the week went on, I felt like I was getting into slight arguments with this staff member every day and today was the worst one yet. She is constantly stating how "stupid" our regulations are and is slighly disrespectful in my conversations with her. I also do not feel like she is the best person to be working with children this age and I wanted to observe her at some point this week or next to really get a feel for what she does in the classroom and if my feelings are valid or if I am just starting to not like her and in turn just don't want to see her work in my building. This is a hard situation for me because there are very few people I can't work with or feel like I can get through to understand different things at work.
In this situation, one of the strategies I would use is to observe without evaluating. I feel like I have already judged her and may not give her a fair shake when it comes to the observation. I need to just observe her open-mindedly and take in everything that happens as it is and not think about it or judge it too much.
I think another good strategy to use would be one of the NVC concepts that says, "state what we want, not what we don't want" (The Center for Nonviolent Communication, n.d). I've kind of molded this to my own situation and I know this particular staff member has a hard time with rules and understanding why they are important to follow. I have been giving her a lot of "don't do this and don't do that" and maybe she needs to hear more about what we can and should do. Maybe going on the more positive side of things would help her see why things are important and why we follow the regulations that we do.
The last helpful strategy I thought of is to just go ahead and print out the article on the 3R's that I found and give it to her to read over. It gives a great outline of what makes early childhood teachers great: respect, responsiveness and relationships. I think the article also has great guidelines to think about when a new teacher first starts because it gives them something to strive for when working with young children and their families.
Hopefully through these three things, my interactions with this staff member will go more smoothly next week and I won't feel so frustrated and annoyed after I work with her.
References
In this situation, one of the strategies I would use is to observe without evaluating. I feel like I have already judged her and may not give her a fair shake when it comes to the observation. I need to just observe her open-mindedly and take in everything that happens as it is and not think about it or judge it too much.
I think another good strategy to use would be one of the NVC concepts that says, "state what we want, not what we don't want" (The Center for Nonviolent Communication, n.d). I've kind of molded this to my own situation and I know this particular staff member has a hard time with rules and understanding why they are important to follow. I have been giving her a lot of "don't do this and don't do that" and maybe she needs to hear more about what we can and should do. Maybe going on the more positive side of things would help her see why things are important and why we follow the regulations that we do.
The last helpful strategy I thought of is to just go ahead and print out the article on the 3R's that I found and give it to her to read over. It gives a great outline of what makes early childhood teachers great: respect, responsiveness and relationships. I think the article also has great guidelines to think about when a new teacher first starts because it gives them something to strive for when working with young children and their families.
Hopefully through these three things, my interactions with this staff member will go more smoothly next week and I won't feel so frustrated and annoyed after I work with her.
References
Cheshire, N. (2007). The 3 R’s: Gateway to infant and toddler learning. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 35(3),
36-38.
Saturday, November 24, 2012
Who Am I as a Communicator?
Well, unfortunately as I write this post, I am still searching for one more person to complete my communication tests for me. My sister and her family were unable to come for Thanksgiving, like they had originally planned, which was unfortunate. I missed seeing them for the holiday and she was also going to assist with my assignment, but I still have my boyfriend's input. Maybe my mom will be able to complete the tests at some point this weekend.
When I took the tests, I scored a 48 on the Communication Anxiety Inventory, a 68 on verbal agressiveness and I was in group 1 on the listening styles profile, which meant I am people-oriented. None of this really surprised me because I know I do have anxiety when it comes to certain communication situations, especially public speaking, but luckily for my job I very rarely have to do this. As I have grown more confident in my position at work, I have spoken out more in meetings and I think this will continue to get better as I work longer in my field.
My boyfriend scored me as a 57 on communication anxiety, a 63 on verbal agressiveness and in group 1 also for my listening style. What I was surprised with was how different our communication anxiety scores were. It still left me in the same category, but his score left me close to being high anxiety and I really don't know that I am. I think he scored me this way because I always complain about speaking publicly and how bad I am at it, plus he has no idea if I participate in meetings at work because he isn't there. But then I got to thinking, maybe that is how I communicate when I am with him or our friends, which is probably what he used for his decisions on the test, so maybe I need to work on my communication so I do not come across as having such high anxiety. I would hate to preceive this to others. I also read through the other types of listening style profiles and he definately does not fall into group 1 like I do, so maybe that is why we have trouble with our communications sometimes. He likes facts, figures and to the point and he isn't afraid if others feelings get hurt. I am not quite that way and I found the different profiles to be interesting.
One of the things I learned this week that I am good at when it comes to communicating is my self-monitoring skills. I find myself to be very observant and I like to just sit back and see how everything is going and what everyone is doing when I am new to a situation. This lets me see how it is approriate to interact and communicate with others and it also gives me insight on what topics to discuss. This helps me in both my personal and professional life because I am not a person that has the put-your-foot-in-mouth moments like I know others have. I usually think things through before I say them and I think this shows respect and also some intelligence.
The other thing I learned this week was about the interaction-appearance theory and how I really follow that in both my personal and professional life. Like I discussed during our discussion this week on the picture and my initial reaction to it, I judge a lot about a person based on what they wear. I don't think this is wrong because I am not a person that is unkind or unwilling to talk to people, I just have initial thoughts about a person based on their clothes. I think this plays into the interaction-apperance theory because even though I may pre-judge people, the more I interact with them and find them to be pleasant, the more I want to continue hanging out with them or working with them, depending on the situation. I may even find that I judged a person unfairly or differently than they are, so this is always interesting when that happens.
I am continuing to learn a lot about my communication styles and also how I communicate based on others preceptions of me. I hope we can continue to get feedback from others on how well we communicate because I think this is a great way to learn about yourself.
References
When I took the tests, I scored a 48 on the Communication Anxiety Inventory, a 68 on verbal agressiveness and I was in group 1 on the listening styles profile, which meant I am people-oriented. None of this really surprised me because I know I do have anxiety when it comes to certain communication situations, especially public speaking, but luckily for my job I very rarely have to do this. As I have grown more confident in my position at work, I have spoken out more in meetings and I think this will continue to get better as I work longer in my field.
My boyfriend scored me as a 57 on communication anxiety, a 63 on verbal agressiveness and in group 1 also for my listening style. What I was surprised with was how different our communication anxiety scores were. It still left me in the same category, but his score left me close to being high anxiety and I really don't know that I am. I think he scored me this way because I always complain about speaking publicly and how bad I am at it, plus he has no idea if I participate in meetings at work because he isn't there. But then I got to thinking, maybe that is how I communicate when I am with him or our friends, which is probably what he used for his decisions on the test, so maybe I need to work on my communication so I do not come across as having such high anxiety. I would hate to preceive this to others. I also read through the other types of listening style profiles and he definately does not fall into group 1 like I do, so maybe that is why we have trouble with our communications sometimes. He likes facts, figures and to the point and he isn't afraid if others feelings get hurt. I am not quite that way and I found the different profiles to be interesting.
One of the things I learned this week that I am good at when it comes to communicating is my self-monitoring skills. I find myself to be very observant and I like to just sit back and see how everything is going and what everyone is doing when I am new to a situation. This lets me see how it is approriate to interact and communicate with others and it also gives me insight on what topics to discuss. This helps me in both my personal and professional life because I am not a person that has the put-your-foot-in-mouth moments like I know others have. I usually think things through before I say them and I think this shows respect and also some intelligence.
The other thing I learned this week was about the interaction-appearance theory and how I really follow that in both my personal and professional life. Like I discussed during our discussion this week on the picture and my initial reaction to it, I judge a lot about a person based on what they wear. I don't think this is wrong because I am not a person that is unkind or unwilling to talk to people, I just have initial thoughts about a person based on their clothes. I think this plays into the interaction-apperance theory because even though I may pre-judge people, the more I interact with them and find them to be pleasant, the more I want to continue hanging out with them or working with them, depending on the situation. I may even find that I judged a person unfairly or differently than they are, so this is always interesting when that happens.
I am continuing to learn a lot about my communication styles and also how I communicate based on others preceptions of me. I hope we can continue to get feedback from others on how well we communicate because I think this is a great way to learn about yourself.
References
O'Hair,
D., & Wiemann, M. (2009). Real communication: An introduction. (1st ed.).
New York: Bedford/St. Martin's
Saturday, November 17, 2012
Strategies to become a better communicator
When I think about the way I communicate with people, I don't think I necessarily communicate in a different way, but I do share information more with some people than I do others. What I mean by this is that depending on who the audience is that I am talking with depends on how much information I share on different topics or about myself. When I am with my family, my boyfriend or my close friends, I communicate more with them than I do with my colleagues or other friends who I do not know as well. It is not that my communication is different or that I treat anyone differently, it is like I am more myself and can speak more freely with those close to me, if that makes sense. I share more details and experiences with those close to me than I do others because we know each other better and depending on what we are talking about, I know I can trust them with given information.
The first strategy to use to be a more effective communicator is to become more culturally sensitive with different groups that I will be working and communicating with. To me this means knowing enough about certain groups to not use streotypes or assuming they are a certain way based on the group they are a part of. If I know about the group I am working with, I feel like I will be a better communicator because I won't use generalizations, but will instead get to know the person on an individual basis.
The second way to be a better communicator is to withhold judgement about people I am working with. I think this is especially true at work when dealing with parents that have different viewpoints than I do. Until I have "walked in their shoes" I really can't understand what they are going through, so I should not judge them. This can affect people's communication because if you are judging people, this is usually obvious in your body language and voice tone. Having an open mind about a situtation or person will make you a less judgemental person and a better communicator.
The last way to be a better communicator is through the saying "Knowledge is power". It kind of goes back to my first strategy, but I think it goes even deeper than that too. For example, if I am going on vacation to a country I am unfamiliar with, doing some research on their customs and knowing a few phrases in their language will get you a lot farther than going in knowing nothing. It shows people you respect them enough to learn about their culture because you are being proactive in helping yourself be a better communicator. If you have knowledge upfront, it makes communication a lot easier and helps alleviate any problems or potential for offending different individuals.
I really feel like there is so much more I need to learn to be a much better communicator, but I do feel like I am on the right track.
References
Beebe,
S.A, Beebe, S.J. & Redmond, M.V.
(2011). Interpersonal
communication and diversity: Adapting to
others. In Interpersonal
communication: Relating to others. (pp.85-114).
Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
The first strategy to use to be a more effective communicator is to become more culturally sensitive with different groups that I will be working and communicating with. To me this means knowing enough about certain groups to not use streotypes or assuming they are a certain way based on the group they are a part of. If I know about the group I am working with, I feel like I will be a better communicator because I won't use generalizations, but will instead get to know the person on an individual basis.
The second way to be a better communicator is to withhold judgement about people I am working with. I think this is especially true at work when dealing with parents that have different viewpoints than I do. Until I have "walked in their shoes" I really can't understand what they are going through, so I should not judge them. This can affect people's communication because if you are judging people, this is usually obvious in your body language and voice tone. Having an open mind about a situtation or person will make you a less judgemental person and a better communicator.
The last way to be a better communicator is through the saying "Knowledge is power". It kind of goes back to my first strategy, but I think it goes even deeper than that too. For example, if I am going on vacation to a country I am unfamiliar with, doing some research on their customs and knowing a few phrases in their language will get you a lot farther than going in knowing nothing. It shows people you respect them enough to learn about their culture because you are being proactive in helping yourself be a better communicator. If you have knowledge upfront, it makes communication a lot easier and helps alleviate any problems or potential for offending different individuals.
I really feel like there is so much more I need to learn to be a much better communicator, but I do feel like I am on the right track.
References
Gonzalez-Mena, J. (2010).
Understanding and appreciating cultural differences. In 50
strategies for communicating and working with diverse families. (pp.
36-38). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)